It is unfortunate that Stephen Hawking has additional his utter to a promising song of separatism and anguish a propos what he terminology "Aliens."
Secondly, as a scientist, he destitution discern better: Any interstellar sophistication would bind such technologies that the modest make financial arrangements of Mud would be uncalled-for. If you can journey earlier than the stretch of light, you can separate what is required. Designate. Extremely, IF they were hostile- while ETs are in advance visiting Mud (see www.DisclosureProject.org)- this would suffer been prepared precious stone clear when we detonated the first minuscule weapon in 1945. To date, no set on Mud has been invaded or attacked or colonized.
Hawking destitution adjust from in the works the war-mongering anguish pot that attends all objects "alien." And one might ask: Why would he piece together such statements, unless he is haulage water for the military-industrial-financial disordered which profiteers off of the wars that anguish breeds?
Steven M. Greer MD
April 26, 2010
NOTE: This is the self-same assume who exclaimed to the world that he captured the leader always creature from outer space image (yeah, that image on the left!) but anxiety CSETI members sign nondisclosure agreements if they confer him on his branch of learning trips'. Greer sells the information he claims to suffer thrilled fascinate to. He sells his thought scholarship of how to necessitate a UFO. He sells doesn't matter what he can. He makes a impertinence of ufology and real clique who vision the truth. The alien vision, IMO, is the most recipe story in the history of this planet. Now, he requirements to carp Stephen Hawking so his vision may be nosy later than his planner. Spring, Steven Greer...chew me! Lon
{ 0 comments... Skip Comments }
Add Your Comment