Jose Caravaca, our Spanish lonesome, conjectures that definite of the images found in the rock paintings of Tassili (above/below) sign scenes of abduction by, we stand, extraterrestrial circle.
The paintings beneath, he envisions, show women being led to a "saucer" or surrounding craft:
This painting (beneath), from Tassili, is frequently cited by Out-of-date Astronaut theorists as an image of a space-helmeted alien being from out-of-the-way the Earth:
And in the orangey painting over, one sees that vastly "hood" on a animal being obsessed everywhere.
Were the helmets attractive for expedition out-of-the-way the Earth's atmosphere?
Were the helmets perceptibly space helmets? Or support of key custom garb?
Senor Caravaca's view is interesting, but is at hand changed explanation for the images?
We don't find an anthropological piece fussily.
Dr. Giorgio Gualco, in the article second hand by Mess about Sordelet, in his posting about Tassili a few time ago, suggests that the paintings are "characterized by human records afterward round heads, frequently demeanor headdresses of horns or ruffle."
Dr. Gualco is axiom the depictions are caricatures of embellishment, but the Tassili paintings didn't make fun of the flora and fauna unfilled, or doesn't matter what else.
The humans pictured are (resourcefully) stylized, but not to a reading that they are unrecognizable as human beings. The women's breasts are wonderful and their sexual characteristics compared to pictures of men is blatant.
So why would the painters fad headdresses (helmets!) that are sophomoric from their actuality; that is, why helmets that are "caricatured" later than no matter which else isn't?
Jose Caravaca's keen eye may stow found no matter which -- no matter which to help AA theory and Curious Convulsion stories anyway.
{ 0 comments... Skip Comments }
Add Your Comment